Auth.+Framework-+Subject+ID+missing

Please contribute your comments via the discussion tab above. Outcomes and resolution will be added at the bottom of this page.

=Subject-id missing=

0 row selected - rows selected - [|clear] || If the requesting (IdP) organization can provide a lookup function for converting the SAML subject identity to the descriptive name, then this should not be mandatory. Making this mandatory for each transaction adds additional overhead to the requesting transaction.
 * ~ 1 - 1 of 1
 * [[image:http://www.wikispaces.com/user/pic/1272057848/John.Moehrke-lg.jpg width="48" height="48" caption="John.Moehrke" link="http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/John.Moehrke"]] || [|John.Moehrke]

It is also not completely clear that HIPAA mandates a descriptive name of the individual that the data was disclosed to. The HIPAA Accounting of Disclosures indicates a need for the "Name". It is not clear what "Name" means. [|[delete]] ||